Overview

Proposed pipeline for experimenting with bridges between three typological systems (Temporistics, Psychosophy, Socionics) and more mainstream trait frameworks. This page records project architecture ideas and empirical survey validation, not simulation or an established mapping standard.

Pipeline Architecture 

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  CROSS-TYPOLOGY MAPPING LAYER                           │
│                                                         │
│  Temporistics (24 types) ──→ MBTI/Jungian (16 types)    │
│  Psychosophy (81 types)  ──→ MBTI/Jungian (16 types)    │
│  Socionics (16 types)    ──→ MBTI/Jungian (16 types)    │
│                        ↓                                │
│              PersonaNexus (trait bridge)                │
│              OCEAN ↔ DISC ↔ Jungian ↔ Custom            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  EMPIRICAL SURVEY VALIDATION LAYER (OASIS-platform)     │
│                                                         │
│  - AI-assisted survey interviews and questionnaires     │
│  - Semi-structured interview guides                     │
│  - Multi-provider LLM support for transcription/coding  │
│  - FAIR-compliant data export                           │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Cross-System Mapping

Socionics → MBTI (Common But Disputed Approximation)

Socionics Common MBTI Approximation Note
ILE ENTP Common community mapping
LIE ENTJ Common community mapping
EIE ENFJ Common community mapping
IEE ENFP Common community mapping
ILI INTP or INTJ Disputed
LII INTP or INTJ Disputed
EII INFJ Common but still approximate
SEE ESFP Approximate

Temporistics → MBTI (Hypothesized)

Temporal framing dimension maps to cognitive style preferences:

Temporistics Frame Primary Preference Secondary
Present types (1-4N) Sensing (concrete) Se/Si
Future types (1-4F) Intuitive (abstract) Ne/Ni
Eternity types (1-4E) Reflective (Ni/Si) Balanced
Past types (1-4P) Memory-oriented Si-heavy

Mapping approach: Temporistics aspect combinations map to Jungian dichotomies:

  • Temporal focus (P/N/F/E) → tentative orientation cues
  • Aspect density → S/N preference
  • Aspect role → T/F and J/P

Psychosophy → MBTI (Hypothesized)

4-aspect structure maps through function weighting:

Psychosophy Pattern Possible MBTI-Like Echo Notes
Logic-heavy Thinking emphasis Approximate only
Emotion-heavy Feeling emphasis Approximate only
Physics-heavy Sensing emphasis Approximate only
Will-heavy Judgment / agency emphasis Approximate only

Validation Hypothesis Example

Combined Temporistics + Socionics predicts satisfaction better than either alone

  • Method: OASIS-platform interviews and structured surveys with 200 real couples
  • Metric: Multi-factor regression, cross-validated
  • Expected: test whether combined features improve prediction over single-system baselines

Tooling Reference

PersonaNexus

  • Purpose: Declarative personality definition with framework mapping
  • Key features: OCEAN↔DISC↔Jungian bidirectional, YAML identity files, archetype inheritance
  • Command: pip install personanexus
  • Example: personanexus personality jungian-to-traits --preset intj

Audit note: Vendor/source verification for this tooling stack is incomplete in the current repo; treat these tool references as exploratory pointers.

OASIS-platform (Survey Interviews)

  • Purpose: Qualitative research interviews and survey intake
  • Key features: Voice/text interview assistance, multi-LLM transcription and coding support, Docker deploy, FAIR-compliant
  • Install: git clone https://github.com/oasis-surveys/oasis-platform && docker compose up
  • License: Open Non-Commercial Research License v1.0

Next Steps

  1. Verify Socionics→MBTI mapping using PersonaNexus archetypes
  2. Hypothesize Temporistics→MBTI based on aspect patterns
  3. Empirical check: OASIS-platform interviews with real typed participants